What battery cells does Tesla use?

Tesla primarily uses three types of cylindrical lithium-ion battery cells: 18650, 2170, and 4680. Early models like Roadster and Model S/X relied on Panasonic-produced 18650 cells with nickel-cobalt-aluminum (NCA) chemistry. The 2170 cells (21mm diameter, 70mm height) debuted in Model 3, offering 20% higher energy density. Since 2020, Tesla’s in-house 4680 cells (46mm×80mm) feature tabless designs and nickel-manganese-cobalt (NMC) chemistry, reducing costs by 14% per kWh while boosting range by 16%.

48V Rack Battery

What are Tesla’s 18650 battery cells?

18650 cells (18mm×65mm) powered Tesla’s early EVs like Roadster and Model S/X. These NCA-based cylindrical cells from Panasonic delivered 3.7V nominal voltage and 250Wh/kg energy density. Pro Tip: Thermal management is critical—older packs required liquid cooling to prevent thermal runaway in tightly packed modules.

Introduced in 2008, the 18650 cells enabled Tesla’s first-generation battery architecture. Each Roadster pack contained 6,831 cells arranged in 11 modules, while Model S/X used ~7,000 cells across 16 modules. Despite their high energy density, the small size increased manufacturing complexity. For example, a single module failure could disable 69 cells simultaneously. Transitioning to larger cells became inevitable as Tesla scaled production. By 2017, the 18650 was phased out for passenger vehicles but remains in Powerwall storage systems.

How do 2170 cells improve upon 18650?

2170 cells (21mm×70mm) increased energy capacity by 50% compared to 18650. Used in Model 3/Y, these NCA cells achieve 300Wh/kg energy density through refined nickel-cobalt ratios. A 75kWh pack contains ~4,400 cells versus 7,000+ in older designs.

By enlarging cell dimensions, Tesla reduced welding points and module count by 30%, lowering production costs. The 2170’s improved current handling supports 250kW Supercharging—30% faster than 18650 systems. However, cobalt reduction (from 11% to <3%) raised thermal sensitivity. Practically speaking, this necessitated advanced battery management systems (BMS) with dual-layer thermal monitoring. For instance, Model 3’s BMS samples cell temperatures every 10ms to prevent localized overheating during rapid discharge.

What makes 4680 cells revolutionary?

4680 cells (46mm×80mm) employ tabless designs and dry electrode coating, boosting power output by 6x. Debuting in 2022 Model Y, these NMC cells reduce internal resistance by 50%, enabling 16% longer range and 15-minute fast-charging.

The tabless “unicorn” design eliminates traditional welded tabs, increasing conductive surface area by 5x. This innovation cuts heat generation by 20% during 3C-rate charging. Combined with structural battery packs, 4680 cells integrate cells directly into chassis, reducing weight by 10%. For example, Berlin-made Model Y’s 4680 pack contains 1,080 cells versus 4,400 in 2170 versions. But what happens if a cell fails? Tesla’s fused cell interconnects isolate damaged units without cascading failures.

Which chemistries does Tesla use?

Tesla employs NCA (nickel-cobalt-aluminum) in 18650/2170 cells and NMC (nickel-manganese-cobalt) in 4680 cells. Chinese Model 3 uses CATL’s LFP (lithium iron phosphate) for cost efficiency.

NCA’s 80:15:5 nickel-cobalt-aluminum ratio maximizes energy density but requires precise thermal controls. In contrast, 4680’s NMC 811 (80% nickel, 10% manganese, 10% cobalt) improves thermal stability by 15% while maintaining high capacity. LFP cells, though 20% heavier, enable 4,000+ cycles—double NCA’s lifespan. For instance, Shanghai’s LFP Model 3 retains 70% capacity after 500,000 km, ideal for taxi fleets. Transitioning between chemistries demands BMS reprogramming; mixing types in one pack is strictly avoided.

How do cell designs impact performance?

Cylindrical cells balance energy density and thermal safety better than pouches. The 4680’s tabless design reduces electron travel distance by 80%, slashing resistance from 20mΩ to 2mΩ. This enables 6x higher power discharge for Plaid acceleration.

Traditional 18650 cells lose 8% energy to internal resistance at peak loads. The 4680’s structural approach eliminates module casings, improving volumetric efficiency by 30%. Imagine replacing individual bricks in a wall with poured concrete—the pack becomes both energy store and chassis component. However, repair complexity increases; collision damage often requires full pack replacement.

What’s next for Tesla batteries?

Tesla’s Roadrunner project aims for 3TWh annual production by 2030. Expect 4695 cells with silicon-anode tech for 500Wh/kg density and sub-$70/kWh costs by 2026.

Silicon anodes could increase capacity by 40% but historically caused swelling. Tesla’s elastic binder and nanostructured silicon mitigate expansion by 90%. Paired with solid-state electrolytes in development, future cells may achieve 600-mile ranges. Beyond cars, these advancements will enhance Telecom Lithium Battery systems—imagine 72-hour backup from a single rack. Still, raw material sourcing remains a hurdle; cobalt-free chemistries are prioritized despite nickel’s geopolitical challenges.

RackBattery Expert Insight

FAQs